Here are the two points
and
and the line function going through them.
![[Graphics:Images/index_gr_3.gif]](Images/index_gr_3.gif)
![[Graphics:Images/index_gr_4.gif]](Images/index_gr_4.gif)
Add to this plot the plot of the exponential function
that goes through the same two points.
Answer:
Call
the exponential function that goes through these two points:
![[Graphics:Images/index_gr_7.gif]](Images/index_gr_7.gif)
is a line function that goes through:
![[Graphics:Images/index_gr_10.gif]](Images/index_gr_10.gif)
So
is given by:
![[Graphics:Images/index_gr_13.gif]](Images/index_gr_13.gif)
But
,
so
is given by:
![[Graphics:Images/index_gr_17.gif]](Images/index_gr_17.gif)
This is the exponential function
with
and
.
Here comes the plot:
![[Graphics:Images/index_gr_22.gif]](Images/index_gr_22.gif)
![[Graphics:Images/index_gr_23.gif]](Images/index_gr_23.gif)
Lookin' fine.
Information relating the variable
and the function
may consist of nothing more than some measurements indicating the observed value of
for various values of
. A quick plot of the data usually reveals to the alert eye whether the functional relationship of
in terms of
is of the form
.
If the plot of the data looks like this:
![[Graphics:Images/index_gr_32.gif]](Images/index_gr_32.gif)
![[Graphics:Images/index_gr_33.gif]](Images/index_gr_33.gif)
Then you are happy fitting these data with a line:
![[Graphics:Images/index_gr_34.gif]](Images/index_gr_34.gif)
![[Graphics:Images/index_gr_36.gif]](Images/index_gr_36.gif)
![[Graphics:Images/index_gr_37.gif]](Images/index_gr_37.gif)
Not bad.
Sometimes the points do not line up in a straight line:
![[Graphics:Images/index_gr_38.gif]](Images/index_gr_38.gif)
![[Graphics:Images/index_gr_39.gif]](Images/index_gr_39.gif)
This looks suspiciously exponential.
How do you better eyeball an exponential relationship?
How do you come up with a compromise exponential function
whose plot runs through or near the data points above?
Answer:
Here are the data points in the form
:
![[Graphics:Images/index_gr_42.gif]](Images/index_gr_42.gif)
The following instruction keeps the first slots fixed but replaces the corresponding second slot by its base
logarithm:
![[Graphics:Images/index_gr_44.gif]](Images/index_gr_44.gif)
Now plot the logdata points:
![[Graphics:Images/index_gr_46.gif]](Images/index_gr_46.gif)
![[Graphics:Images/index_gr_47.gif]](Images/index_gr_47.gif)
These points nearly line up in a perfect straight line.
This is a dead give-away that the data display a strong exponential relationship.
Let's agree that
![]()
is a compromise exponential function whose plot does a good job of going with the flow of these data points.
is a compromise line function that flows with:
![[Graphics:Images/index_gr_50.gif]](Images/index_gr_50.gif)
So
is given by:
![[Graphics:Images/index_gr_53.gif]](Images/index_gr_53.gif)
But
,
so
is given by:
![[Graphics:Images/index_gr_57.gif]](Images/index_gr_57.gif)
This is the exponential function
with
and
.
Here comes the plot:
![[Graphics:Images/index_gr_62.gif]](Images/index_gr_62.gif)
![[Graphics:Images/index_gr_63.gif]](Images/index_gr_63.gif)
No problem at all.
If there were an entry
in the exponential data table in part i), what would you bet that
would be?
Answer:
Go with the exponential fit
and plug in
:
![[Graphics:Images/index_gr_68.gif]](Images/index_gr_68.gif)
If there were an entry
in the exponential data table in part i), what would you bet that
would be?
Answer:
Go with the exponential fit
and plug in
:
![[Graphics:Images/index_gr_74.gif]](Images/index_gr_74.gif)